PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEM.DE achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than ENTR.DE's 12.78% return.


XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.67%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.73%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%

ENTR.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.78%
6M
23.00%
1Y
37.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.DE and ENTR.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ENTR.DE
ENTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.DEENTR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.86

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

13.56

-0.29

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.DE and ENTR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.DEENTR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.27

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.92

-0.02

Drawdowns

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and ENTR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.DEENTR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-14.17%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-9.72%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.59%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-5.85%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.77%

-0.41%

Volatility

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) at 4.62%. This indicates that XDEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.DEENTR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

4.62%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

13.78%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

16.50%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

15.02%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.02%

+2.83%

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEM.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEM.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEM.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.

XDEM.DE is categorized as Momentum, while ENTR.DE is Commodities. XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.DE and ENTR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer