DRNZ vs. REMX
DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRNZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
DRNZ vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 22.66% return.
DRNZ
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -12.50%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 131.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
DRNZ vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | -1.62% | -12.91% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 22.66% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNZ and REMX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRNZ vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
DRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REMX
DRNZ vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRNZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRNZ vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -27.02%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -90.20% | +63.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.02% | -58.48% | +31.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -66.82% | +54.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.91% | — |
Volatility
DRNZ vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRNZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.18% | 50.00% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 40.71% | +10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 37.15% | +14.03% |
DRNZ vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRNZ vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.43% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRNZ and REMX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
DRNZ is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for DRNZ and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer