PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D (XDED.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDED.DE having a 10.41% return and XDWD.DE slightly higher at 10.91%.


XDED.DE

1D
0.26%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.28%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
10Y*

XDWD.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.63%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.96%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDED.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D
10.41%-0.44%18.53%10.75%
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
10.91%7.85%25.98%16.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XDED.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023

0.80

The correlation between XDED.DE and XDWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDED.DE
XDED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XDED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWD.DE
XDWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D (XDED.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDED.DEXDWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.63

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

14.44

-4.16

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDED.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDED.DE and XDWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDED.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.14

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.78

+0.11

Drawdowns

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDED.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.63%, smaller than the maximum XDWD.DE drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDED.DE and XDWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDED.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.63%

-33.55%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-6.54%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-21.64%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-4.55%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.65%

+0.07%

Volatility

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D (XDED.DE) is 2.08%, while Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that XDED.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDED.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

2.60%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

7.77%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.72%

11.12%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

14.13%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

15.16%

-1.77%

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDED.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDED.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDED.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while XDWD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
XDED.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 2D
1.25%1.35%1.61%0.83%
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDED.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWD.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWD.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDED.DE.

XDED.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XDED.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDED.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDED.DE and XDWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer