PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEC vs. ZOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than ZOCT's 2.64% return.


XDEC

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.62%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.96%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
10Y*

ZOCT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.94%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDEC and ZOCT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.80

The correlation between XDEC and ZOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEC vs. ZOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEC
XDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDECZOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.72

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

4.99

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.12

24.15

-6.03

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the ZOCT Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEC and ZOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDECZOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

3.29

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.91

-0.95

Drawdowns

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, which is greater than ZOCT's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and ZOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDECZOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-3.18%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.91%

-1.46%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.04%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-0.34%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.30%

+0.37%

Volatility

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) at 0.30%. This indicates that XDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDECZOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.30%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

1.69%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

2.22%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

3.04%

+5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

3.04%

+5.43%

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEC vs. ZOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEC nor ZOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEC and ZOCT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDEC has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to ZOCT (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDEC dropped -11.75% vs ZOCT's -3.18%.

On 1-year performance, XDEC leads with 12.16% vs 7.26% for ZOCT. On fees, ZOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDEC has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XDEC.

XDEC and ZOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XDEC and 0.79% for ZOCT.

ZOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEC and ZOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer