XDEC vs. NAPR
XDEC (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust - Benchmark TR Gross, while NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDEC returned 10.02%/yr vs 13.26%/yr for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.
Performance
XDEC vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 10.51% return.
XDEC
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEC vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December | 4.43% | 9.71% | 9.61% | 14.37% | -3.38% | 1.88% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.51% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 30.60% | -12.13% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEC and NAPR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XDEC and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDEC vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEC
NAPR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDEC
NAPR
Financial Services
XDEC
NAPR
Communication Services
XDEC
NAPR
Consumer Cyclical
XDEC
NAPR
Healthcare
XDEC
NAPR
Industrials
XDEC
NAPR
Consumer Defensive
XDEC
NAPR
Energy
XDEC
NAPR
Utilities
XDEC
NAPR
Real Estate
XDEC
NAPR
Basic Materials
XDEC
NAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEC vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank
XDEC
NAPR
XDEC vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEC | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.18 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 14.95 | -11.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | 84.84 | -66.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEC | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 4.78 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.07 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
XDEC vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and NAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEC | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -16.53% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.91% | -1.24% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | -14.52% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.12% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -2.28% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.22% | +0.45% |
Volatility
XDEC vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) is 0.72%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that XDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEC | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 1.10% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 2.82% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 3.89% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 11.27% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 10.61% | -2.14% |
XDEC vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEC vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEC nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEC and NAPR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAPR has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to XDEC (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDEC dropped -11.75% vs NAPR's -16.53%.
On 3-year performance, NAPR leads with 13.26% vs 10.02% for XDEC. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XDEC.
XDEC and NAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NAPR is Nasdaq-100. XDEC tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust - Benchmark TR Gross, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XDEC and 0.79% for NAPR.
NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDEC and NAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer