PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEC vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEC vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 5.09% return.


XDEC

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.62%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.96%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
5.09%
6M
4.26%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEC vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDEC
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December
4.43%9.71%9.61%8.27%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
5.09%19.43%-2.58%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEC and DOGG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2023

0.36

The correlation between XDEC and DOGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEC vs. DOGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEC
DOGG

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
30.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
29.9%

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
19.9%

Energy

3.5%
10.0%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XDEC
36.2%
DOGG

-

Financial Services

XDEC
11.9%
DOGG

-

Communication Services

XDEC
10.9%
DOGG
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEC
10.1%
DOGG
30.1%

Healthcare

XDEC
8.4%
DOGG
29.9%

Industrials

XDEC
8.1%
DOGG

-

Consumer Defensive

XDEC
4.9%
DOGG
19.9%

Energy

XDEC
3.5%
DOGG
10.0%

Utilities

XDEC
2.3%
DOGG

-

Real Estate

XDEC
1.9%
DOGG

-

Basic Materials

XDEC
1.8%
DOGG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEC vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEC
XDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEC vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDECDOGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.27

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.92

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.12

4.53

+13.58

XDEC vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEC and DOGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDECDOGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

1.53

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.85

+0.11

Drawdowns

XDEC vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and DOGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDECDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-11.19%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.91%

-8.29%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-11.19%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-7.62%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-3.22%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

3.50%

-2.83%

Volatility

XDEC vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) is 0.72%, while FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that XDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDECDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

3.20%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

8.04%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

10.43%

-5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

12.97%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

12.97%

-4.50%

XDEC vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEC vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

XDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.90%8.75%9.92%5.89%
XDEC
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEC and DOGG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOGG has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to XDEC (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDEC dropped -11.75% vs DOGG's -11.19%.

On 3-year performance, DOGG leads with 11.91% vs 10.02% for XDEC. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DOGG has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XDEC.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 0.00% for XDEC.

XDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DOGG is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XDEC and 0.75% for DOGG.

XDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEC and DOGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer