PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while XZHE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XZHE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%

XZHE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%0.60%
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.63%11.10%1.12%7.71%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and XZHE.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022

0.33

The correlation between XDEB.L and XZHE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XZHE.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.LXZHE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.LXZHE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.LXZHE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.LXZHE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEB.L and XZHE.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.L vs. XZHE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor XZHE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.L and XZHE.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L and XZHE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDEB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XZHE.L is European High Yield Bonds. XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XZHE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and XZHE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer