XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L
XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and XUFB.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XUFB.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEB.L returned 6.36%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for XUFB.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUFB.L.
Performance
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly higher than XUFB.L's -0.52% return.
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
XUFB.L
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.04% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | -0.96% | 18.55% | -3.84% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | -0.52% | 23.40% | 40.02% | 5.21% | -10.18% | 37.53% | -18.78% | 35.43% | -8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEB.L and XUFB.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018 | 0.36 |
The correlation between XDEB.L and XUFB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Financial Services
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
Healthcare
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Communication Services
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Industrials
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Utilities
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Energy
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Basic Materials
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Real Estate
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEB.L
XUFB.L
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEB.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.24 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 1.92 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 5.08 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEB.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.36 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.45 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.44 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum XUFB.L drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and XUFB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEB.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -41.84% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -14.33% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.47% | -27.91% | +19.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.19% | -34.18% | +23.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -3.68% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -12.33% | +8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 5.41% | -3.09% |
Volatility
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUFB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEB.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 6.55% | -3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 15.77% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.97% | 20.12% | -12.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 24.14% | -14.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 28.85% | -17.33% |
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XUFB.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEB.L vs. XUFB.L - Dividend Comparison
XDEB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | 1.76% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 2.54% | 3.43% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEB.L and XUFB.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.
XDEB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XUFB.L is Financials Equities. XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XUFB.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.12% for XUFB.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and XUFB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer