XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and XBCU.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XBCU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.L returned 7.93%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for XBCU.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XBCU.L.

Performance

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while XBCU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XBCU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than XBCU.L's 23.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.L has underperformed XBCU.L with an annualized return of 7.93%, while XBCU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.

XDEB.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 2.65%
• 3Y*: 6.61%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

XBCU.L

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 23.65%
• 6M: 25.36%
• 1Y: 46.95%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 16.80%
• 10Y*: 10.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C	1.04%	3.40%	13.01%	1.49%	1.23%	16.00%	-0.96%	18.55%	3.44%	7.02%
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C	23.65%	17.11%	10.54%	-14.47%	35.34%	40.95%	-4.23%	3.45%	-6.04%	-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and XBCU.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014	0.27

The correlation between XDEB.L and XBCU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDEB.L	XBCU.L
Technology	20.1%	41.0%
Financial Services	14.0%	4.2%
Healthcare	13.8%	6.1%
Communication Services	12.1%	16.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.9%	9.9%
Industrials	9.2%	9.4%
Utilities	8.1%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	5.1%
Energy	4.5%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.4%
Real Estate	0.7%	3.4%

Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L

XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

XBCU.L

XBCU.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
XBCU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XBCU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XBCU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XBCU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XBCU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDEB.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	2.53	-2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	3.06	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.46	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	5.86	-5.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	14.41	-13.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the XBCU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and XBCU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEB.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	2.53	-2.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.92	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.63	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.31	+0.47

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum XBCU.L drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and XBCU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEB.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-52.27%	+32.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-7.97%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.47%	-15.39%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.19%	-27.98%	+17.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.61%	-31.79%	+12.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-1.94%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-24.34%	+20.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	3.25%	-0.93%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBCU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDEB.L	XBCU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	4.17%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	15.25%	-9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.97%	18.47%	-10.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.68%	18.16%	-8.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.52%	17.18%	-5.66%

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCU.L's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEB.L vs. XBCU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor XBCU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEB.L and XBCU.L in my portfolio?

XDEB.L and XBCU.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDEB.L or XBCU.L?

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEB.L or XBCU.L?

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XBCU.L.

What is the main difference between XDEB.L and XBCU.L?

XDEB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XBCU.L is Commodities. XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XBCU.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.29% for XBCU.L.