XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L
XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.L returned 7.93%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for SEMA.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SEMA.L.
Performance
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than SEMA.L's 26.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.L has underperformed SEMA.L with an annualized return of 7.93%, while SEMA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.90% annualized return.
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
SEMA.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 26.04%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 53.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.04% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | -0.96% | 18.55% | 3.44% | 7.02% |
SEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.04% | 25.09% | 9.38% | 3.47% | -10.74% | -1.60% | 14.69% | 12.62% | -9.25% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEB.L and SEMA.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014 | 0.49 |
The correlation between XDEB.L and SEMA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Financial Services
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Healthcare
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Communication Services
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Consumer Defensive
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Industrials
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Utilities
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Energy
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Basic Materials
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Real Estate
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEB.L
SEMA.L
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEB.L | SEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.59 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 4.90 | -4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 17.45 | -16.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEB.L | SEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 3.16 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.53 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.61 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.40 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum SEMA.L drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and SEMA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEB.L | SEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -31.75% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -10.95% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.47% | -15.23% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.19% | -23.52% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.61% | -27.06% | +7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -2.37% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -10.72% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.08% | -0.76% |
Volatility
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEB.L | SEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 7.29% | -4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 14.56% | -8.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.97% | 17.00% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 16.21% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 18.05% | -6.53% |
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEB.L vs. SEMA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEB.L nor SEMA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEB.L and SEMA.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.
XDEB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.18% for SEMA.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and SEMA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer