PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%3.54%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-4.10%6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and MWRD.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.68

The correlation between XDEB.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEB.L
MWRD.L

Technology

20.1%
24.7%

Financial Services

14.0%
14.7%

Healthcare

13.8%
12.4%

Communication Services

12.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
6.7%

Industrials

9.2%
10.6%

Utilities

8.1%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
10.5%

Energy

4.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.4%

Technology

XDEB.L
20.1%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

XDEB.L
14.0%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Healthcare

XDEB.L
13.8%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Communication Services

XDEB.L
12.1%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

XDEB.L
10.9%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Industrials

XDEB.L
9.2%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Utilities

XDEB.L
8.1%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEB.L
5.6%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Energy

XDEB.L
4.5%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

XDEB.L
1.1%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Real Estate

XDEB.L
0.7%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer