XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from DWS and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEB.L returned 6.12%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for LGGG.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGG.L.

Performance

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than LGGG.L's 9.76% return.

XDEB.L

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 5.40%
• 3Y*: 7.75%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: 7.50%

LGGG.L

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 9.88%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 18.26%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C	1.91%	3.40%	13.01%	1.49%	1.23%	16.00%	-0.96%	18.55%	-2.28%
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	9.76%	12.92%	21.13%	18.08%	-8.24%	23.53%	12.41%	22.99%	-27.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and LGGG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.L and LGGG.L has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDEB.L	LGGG.L
Technology	22.0%	31.5%
Financial Services	13.9%	15.2%
Healthcare	13.6%	8.6%
Communication Services	11.9%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	4.9%
Industrials	9.3%	10.5%
Utilities	7.7%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	9.4%
Energy	4.0%	3.6%
Basic Materials	1.1%	3.2%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L

XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

LGGG.L

LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDEB.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	2.47	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	3.44	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.47	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	3.88	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.21	15.16	-12.95

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and LGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -42.88%, which is greater than LGGG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and LGGG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEB.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.88%	-30.19%	-12.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-6.67%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.11%	-19.95%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.11%	-19.95%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-1.27%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-7.18%	-5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	1.71%	+0.73%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.06%, while L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDEB.L	LGGG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	3.20%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.05%	7.79%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.10%	10.47%	-2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	19.12%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	20.36%	-1.84%

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDEB.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor LGGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEB.L and LGGG.L in my portfolio?

XDEB.L and LGGG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDEB.L or LGGG.L?

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEB.L or LGGG.L?

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.

What is the main difference between XDEB.L and LGGG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.