PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while IQCY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IQCY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than IQCY.L's 30.19% return.


XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%

IQCY.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
11.12%
YTD
30.19%
6M
28.29%
1Y
50.00%
3Y*
92.20%
5Y*
48.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%3.96%
IQCY.L
Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
30.19%14.12%342.87%17.77%-16.95%17.73%34.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and IQCY.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.L and IQCY.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEB.L
IQCY.L

Technology

20.1%
45.0%

Financial Services

14.0%
0.5%

Healthcare

13.8%
0.1%

Communication Services

12.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
0.0%

Industrials

9.2%
46.5%

Utilities

8.1%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
0.7%

Energy

4.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.0%

Technology

XDEB.L
20.1%
IQCY.L
45.0%

Financial Services

XDEB.L
14.0%
IQCY.L
0.5%

Healthcare

XDEB.L
13.8%
IQCY.L
0.1%

Communication Services

XDEB.L
12.1%
IQCY.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

XDEB.L
10.9%
IQCY.L
0.0%

Industrials

XDEB.L
9.2%
IQCY.L
46.5%

Utilities

XDEB.L
8.1%
IQCY.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEB.L
5.6%
IQCY.L
0.7%

Energy

XDEB.L
4.5%
IQCY.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

XDEB.L
1.1%
IQCY.L
1.4%

Real Estate

XDEB.L
0.7%
IQCY.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IQCY.L
IQCY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.LIQCY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.54

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

5.29

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

15.92

-14.78

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and IQCY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.LIQCY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

3.10

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.37

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.39

+0.39

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum IQCY.L drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and IQCY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.LIQCY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-22.65%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-9.40%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-21.98%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.19%

-22.65%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-1.35%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-6.23%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.13%

-0.81%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQCY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.LIQCY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

6.49%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

12.58%

-6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

16.06%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

131.45%

-121.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

119.50%

-107.98%

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQCY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEB.L vs. IQCY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor IQCY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.L and IQCY.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.

XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.45% for IQCY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and IQCY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer