PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than XNZN.DE's 0.62% return.


XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.64%
1Y
0.46%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%

XNZN.DE

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
0.62%
6M
2.71%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.53%
XNZN.DE
Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
0.62%1.04%3.46%12.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.DE and XNZN.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XNZN.DE
XNZN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XNZN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.DEXNZN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.03

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

0.11

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

0.29

-0.32

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the XNZN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.DE and XNZN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.DEXNZN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

0.09

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.34

+0.36

Drawdowns

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than XNZN.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and XNZN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.DEXNZN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-23.90%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-13.08%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-23.90%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-9.13%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-7.13%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

4.84%

-2.47%

Volatility

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) is 2.63%, while Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that XDEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNZN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.DEXNZN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.52%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

12.12%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

15.38%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

16.12%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

16.12%

-4.09%

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNZN.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.DE vs. XNZN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.DE nor XNZN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.DE and XNZN.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNZN.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

XDEB.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XNZN.DE is Europe Equities. XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XNZN.DE tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.DE and 0.15% for XNZN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and XNZN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer