PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.DE's 22.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.DE has underperformed XDEM.DE with an annualized return of 6.88%, while XDEM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.64%
1Y
0.46%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%

XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
6.77%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.63%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%24.01%-6.66%26.17%1.99%3.04%
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.76%8.09%38.24%8.17%-13.85%25.04%16.52%31.63%0.79%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.DEXDEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.34

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

3.47

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

13.27

-13.31

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

1.86

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.94

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.90

-0.20

Drawdowns

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.DE drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-30.93%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-9.05%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-23.51%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-23.51%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-30.93%

+2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-0.95%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-5.97%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.36%

+0.01%

Volatility

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) is 2.63%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that XDEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

5.80%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

14.20%

-8.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

16.85%

-8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

17.30%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

17.85%

-5.82%

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.DE nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDEB.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XDEM.DE is Momentum. XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and XDEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer