PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than JPGL.DE's 14.83% return.


XDEB.DE

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.84%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.66%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
7.15%

JPGL.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
3.41%
YTD
14.83%
6M
15.51%
1Y
25.01%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
3.07%-1.27%17.84%3.65%-4.26%24.29%-6.66%5.02%
JPGL.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
14.83%5.19%16.53%9.72%-4.98%33.81%-3.57%6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.DE and JPGL.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.83

The correlation between XDEB.DE and JPGL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

JPGL.DE
JPGL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEB.DEJPGL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.52

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

5.23

-4.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

20.51

-18.43

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.DE and JPGL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.DE drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and JPGL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-35.54%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-4.76%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-17.34%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-17.34%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

0.00%

-5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-4.76%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.22%

+0.82%

Volatility

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE) have volatilities of 2.02% and 2.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.00%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

6.09%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.95%

8.63%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

11.86%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

14.94%

-2.20%

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPGL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.DE nor JPGL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.DE and JPGL.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPGL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPGL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while JPGL.DE tracks JP Morgan Diversified Factor Global Developed (Region Aware) Equity. They also come from different issuers: DWS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.DE and 0.20% for JPGL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and JPGL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer