XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE
XDEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - XDEB.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while EUNL.DE tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.DE returned 6.88%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for EUNL.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEB.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.DE has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 6.88%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
XDEB.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.74% | -1.27% | 17.83% | 3.66% | -4.06% | 24.01% | -6.66% | 26.17% | 1.99% | 3.04% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 31.34% | -5.13% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEB.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.DE and EUNL.DE has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDEB.DE
EUNL.DE
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEB.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.40 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.64 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 14.52 | -14.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEB.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 2.12 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.90 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.84 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.82 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEB.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -33.63% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -6.50% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.02% | -21.73% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -21.73% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.57% | -33.63% | +5.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.53% | -0.31% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -4.25% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.64% | +0.73% |
Volatility
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEB.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.62% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.56% | 7.72% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.86% | 11.16% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 14.17% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 15.17% | -3.14% |
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEB.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEB.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEB.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.DE.
XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer