XDDX.L vs. UD03.L
XDDX.L (Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) and UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - XDDX.L tracks the FSE DAX TR EUR while UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDDX.L returned 8.74%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for UD03.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDDX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD03.L.
Performance
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDDX.L achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.
XDDX.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDDX.L Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 3.63% | 24.81% | 11.28% | 17.04% | -8.48% | 7.86% | 9.39% | -0.38% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 12.28% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDDX.L and UD03.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, XDDX.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Industrials
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Technology
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Communication Services
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Basic Materials
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Healthcare
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Real Estate
XDDX.L
UD03.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDDX.L
UD03.L
Energy
XDDX.L
-
UD03.L
Utilities
XDDX.L
-
UD03.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDDX.L
UD03.L
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDDX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.61 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 5.70 | -5.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 16.25 | -14.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDDX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 3.47 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.75 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.19 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDDX.L and UD03.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDDX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.15% | -30.85% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -9.80% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.36% | -11.72% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.84% | -18.67% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -1.19% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -3.31% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 3.56% | +0.79% |
Volatility
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that XDDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDDX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 3.58% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.21% | 16.13% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 27.46% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 47.29% | -29.30% |
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDDX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDDX.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison
XDDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than UD03.L's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDDX.L Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 2.30% | 2.39% | 2.75% | 3.30% | 5.08% | 2.13% | 3.09% | 2.87% | 2.26% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDDX.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDDX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDDX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.
XDDX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDDX.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.
Find the right allocation for XDDX.L and UD03.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer