PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDDX.L achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.


XDDX.L

1D
0.35%
1M
5.76%
YTD
3.63%
6M
6.44%
1Y
8.77%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
9.67%

PRUK.L

1D
1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
2.88%
6M
5.16%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDDX.L
Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
3.63%24.81%11.28%17.04%-8.48%7.86%5.39%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
2.88%13.57%5.85%7.37%-22.76%12.69%22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XDDX.L and PRUK.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.66

The correlation between XDDX.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDDX.L
PRUK.L

Financial Services

29.9%
19.9%

Industrials

18.3%
22.2%

Technology

15.4%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
13.2%

Communication Services

8.7%
6.8%

Basic Materials

8.3%
7.3%

Healthcare

5.3%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
6.4%

Energy

-

2.9%

Utilities

-

3.4%

Financial Services

XDDX.L
29.9%
PRUK.L
19.9%

Industrials

XDDX.L
18.3%
PRUK.L
22.2%

Technology

XDDX.L
15.4%
PRUK.L
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDDX.L
11.0%
PRUK.L
13.2%

Communication Services

XDDX.L
8.7%
PRUK.L
6.8%

Basic Materials

XDDX.L
8.3%
PRUK.L
7.3%

Healthcare

XDDX.L
5.3%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Real Estate

XDDX.L
1.5%
PRUK.L
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

XDDX.L
1.5%
PRUK.L
6.4%

Energy

XDDX.L

-

PRUK.L
2.9%

Utilities

XDDX.L

-

PRUK.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDDX.L
XDDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XDDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDDX.LPRUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.76

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

2.52

-0.51

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDDX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDDX.L and PRUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDDX.LPRUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.70

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.05

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.38

+0.08

Drawdowns

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, roughly equal to the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDDX.L and PRUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDDX.LPRUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-36.10%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-13.05%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.36%

-18.00%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.84%

-36.10%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-3.76%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-14.80%

+8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

3.93%

+0.42%

Volatility

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) is 4.38%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that XDDX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDDX.LPRUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.82%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

11.72%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

14.14%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.54%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

17.45%

+0.54%

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDDX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDDX.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison

XDDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than PRUK.L's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDDX.L
Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
2.30%2.39%2.75%3.30%5.08%2.13%3.09%2.87%2.26%2.08%1.31%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDDX.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDDX.L.

XDDX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDDX.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDDX.L and PRUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer