XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE
XDCC.DE (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDCC.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate, while XDWD.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDCC.DE returned 0.11%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for XDWD.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDCC.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XDWD.DE.
Performance
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDCC.DE is traded in USD, while XDWD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDWD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDCC.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than XDWD.DE's 9.62% return.
XDCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWD.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 10.65%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDCC.DE Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.36% | 8.20% | 1.13% | 9.22% | -17.61% | 20.86% | -1.01% |
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 9.62% | 21.76% | 18.77% | 23.98% | -18.42% | 22.27% | 13.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDCC.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, XDCC.DE and XDWD.DE have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDCC.DE
XDWD.DE
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDCC.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 3.05 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 13.15 | -8.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDCC.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.20 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.75 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.70 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, smaller than the maximum XDWD.DE drawdown of -34.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDCC.DE and XDWD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDCC.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -34.03% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -8.47% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.83% | -17.94% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.01% | -25.94% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.51% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -4.78% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.97% | -0.81% |
Volatility
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) is 2.05%, while Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that XDCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDCC.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 2.91% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.17% | 8.73% | -4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 11.73% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 15.52% | -7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.21% | 15.94% | -3.73% |
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDCC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDCC.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDCC.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDCC.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDCC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
XDCC.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XDCC.DE tracks Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XDCC.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDCC.DE and XDWD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer