XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE
XDCC.DE (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and CBU0.DE (iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Corporate Bonds funds - XDCC.DE tracks the Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate while CBU0.DE tracks the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDCC.DE returned 5.17%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for CBU0.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDCC.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CBU0.DE.
Performance
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDCC.DE is traded in USD, while CBU0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CBU0.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDCC.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than CBU0.DE's -2.05% return.
XDCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -2.05%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDCC.DE Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.36% | 8.20% | 1.13% | 4.98% |
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -2.05% | 18.07% | -5.96% | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDCC.DE and CBU0.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XDCC.DE and CBU0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDCC.DE
CBU0.DE
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDCC.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.55 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 1.47 | +3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDCC.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.47 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, which is greater than CBU0.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDCC.DE and CBU0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDCC.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -11.06% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -7.56% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.83% | -11.06% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -4.58% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -3.50% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 2.85% | -1.69% |
Volatility
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XDCC.DE) is 2.05%, while iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that XDCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBU0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDCC.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 2.72% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.17% | 6.76% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 8.95% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 9.88% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.21% | 9.88% | +2.33% |
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDCC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CBU0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDCC.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDCC.DE nor CBU0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDCC.DE and CBU0.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDCC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
XDCC.DE tracks Bloomberg USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate, while CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XDCC.DE and 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDCC.DE and CBU0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer