PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGLE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDBG.L is traded in GBp, while XGLE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDBG.L achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly higher than XGLE.DE's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XDBG.L has outperformed XGLE.DE with an annualized return of 8.57%, while XGLE.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.62% annualized return.


XDBG.L

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.58%
YTD
23.03%
6M
26.01%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
8.57%

XGLE.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
0.07%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-2.16%
10Y*
0.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDBG.L
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged
23.03%25.68%8.15%-11.18%18.13%38.25%-3.17%5.10%-12.92%4.24%
XGLE.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
-0.71%5.91%-2.88%4.63%-13.70%-10.42%10.55%1.08%2.34%4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XDBG.L and XGLE.DE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2011

-0.07

The correlation between XDBG.L and XGLE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDBG.L
XDBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.DE
XGLE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGLE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGLE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDBG.LXGLE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.08

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

0.58

+4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

1.28

+12.10

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the XGLE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDBG.L and XGLE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDBG.LXGLE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.47

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

-0.29

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.07

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.41

-0.33

Drawdowns

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDBG.L drawdown since its inception was -64.69%, which is greater than XGLE.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDBG.L and XGLE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDBG.LXGLE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.69%

-26.75%

-37.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-4.56%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-6.16%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.67%

-21.00%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.06%

-26.75%

-10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-18.88%

+16.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.22%

-8.75%

-26.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.05%

+1.29%

Volatility

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGLE.DE) at 1.93%. This indicates that XDBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDBG.LXGLE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

1.93%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

4.38%

+10.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

5.63%

+12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

7.42%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

8.62%

+7.39%

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDBG.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XGLE.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDBG.L vs. XGLE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDBG.L nor XGLE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDBG.L and XGLE.DE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGLE.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGLE.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDBG.L.

XDBG.L is categorized as Commodities, while XGLE.DE is European Government Bonds. XDBG.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged), while XGLE.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XDBG.L and 0.09% for XGLE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDBG.L and XGLE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer