XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L
XDAX.L (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FSE DAX TR EUR, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAX.L returned 9.31%/yr vs 5.67%/yr for XDWH.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDAX.L is traded in GBp, while XDWH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAX.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.35% return.
XDAX.L
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAX.L Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 0.31% | 28.81% | 13.14% | 17.20% | -7.58% | 7.86% | 9.38% | 16.48% | -17.14% | 3.27% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.35% | 7.04% | 2.51% | -1.38% | 5.83% | 21.71% | 9.57% | 18.28% | 7.59% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAX.L and XDWH.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XDAX.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
-
Industrials
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Financial Services
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Technology
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
Basic Materials
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
Energy
XDAX.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDAX.L
XDWH.L
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDAX.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 1.21 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 3.15 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDAX.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.86 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.40 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAX.L drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAX.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAX.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -18.80% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.83% | -10.43% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -18.80% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.44% | -18.80% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -5.80% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -4.41% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 4.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) is 4.71%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that XDAX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAX.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.30% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 10.98% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.15% | 14.58% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 14.02% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 15.50% | +3.26% |
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDAX.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDAX.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAX.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDAX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDAX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.
XDAX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDAX.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for XDAX.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer