PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDAX.L is traded in GBp, while VWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAX.L achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VWRD.L's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, XDAX.L has underperformed VWRD.L with an annualized return of 7.87%, while VWRD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.


XDAX.L

1D
1.70%
1M
1.66%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
7.87%

VWRD.L

1D
2.47%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
-1.06%28.81%13.14%17.20%-7.58%7.86%9.38%16.48%-17.14%-0.54%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.83%13.67%19.71%16.20%-8.46%19.64%12.72%20.89%-4.34%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAX.L and VWRD.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.70

The correlation between XDAX.L and VWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDAX.L
VWRD.L

Industrials

34.8%
10.2%

Financial Services

21.0%
16.1%

Technology

13.2%
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
9.1%

Communication Services

6.1%
8.9%

Healthcare

5.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

5.3%
3.6%

Utilities

5.0%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.9%

Energy

-

4.3%

Industrials

XDAX.L
34.8%
VWRD.L
10.2%

Financial Services

XDAX.L
21.0%
VWRD.L
16.1%

Technology

XDAX.L
13.2%
VWRD.L
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XDAX.L
7.0%
VWRD.L
9.1%

Communication Services

XDAX.L
6.1%
VWRD.L
8.9%

Healthcare

XDAX.L
5.7%
VWRD.L
8.1%

Basic Materials

XDAX.L
5.3%
VWRD.L
3.6%

Utilities

XDAX.L
5.0%
VWRD.L
2.9%

Real Estate

XDAX.L
1.0%
VWRD.L
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDAX.L
0.9%
VWRD.L
4.9%

Energy

XDAX.L

-

VWRD.L
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAX.L
XDAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDAX.LVWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.42

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

3.96

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

14.88

-13.75

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAX.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAX.L drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAX.L and VWRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDAX.LVWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.95%

-25.85%

-28.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.83%

-6.96%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-18.12%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.44%

-18.12%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.99%

-25.85%

-18.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-1.53%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-3.40%

-9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

1.86%

+2.20%

Volatility

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDAX.LVWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.40%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

9.74%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

12.26%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

14.13%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

15.30%

+4.24%

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDAX.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDAX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.25%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDAX.L and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDAX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDAX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

XDAX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDAX.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAX.L and VWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer