XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XDAX.L (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) and IMIB.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - XDAX.L tracks the FSE DAX TR EUR while IMIB.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDAX.L returned 8.29%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for IMIB.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IMIB.L.

Performance

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAX.L achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than IMIB.L's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XDAX.L has underperformed IMIB.L with an annualized return of 8.29%, while IMIB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.

XDAX.L

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.99%
• 1Y: 6.82%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

IMIB.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 17.51%
• 1Y: 38.30%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 20.48%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDAX.L Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C	0.17%	28.81%	13.14%	17.20%	-7.58%	7.86%	9.38%	16.48%	-17.14%	-0.54%
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	16.85%	43.78%	13.17%	30.55%	-3.59%	18.30%	1.46%	24.85%	-12.68%	20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAX.L and IMIB.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.76

The correlation between XDAX.L and IMIB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDAX.L	IMIB.L
Industrials	34.1%	11.4%
Financial Services	20.0%	45.3%
Technology	15.4%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	9.9%
Communication Services	6.2%	1.7%
Healthcare	5.5%	1.2%
Basic Materials	5.0%	0.5%
Utilities	4.5%	15.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.3%
Energy	-	7.9%

Return for Risk

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAX.L

XDAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
XDAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XDAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XDAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XDAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

IMIB.L

IMIB.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IMIB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IMIB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
IMIB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IMIB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDAX.L	IMIB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	2.53	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	3.41	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.44	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	3.71	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.66	13.54	-11.88

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAX.L and IMIB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAX.L drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, smaller than the maximum IMIB.L drawdown of -70.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAX.L and IMIB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDAX.L	IMIB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.95%	-70.29%	+16.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.83%	-10.28%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.98%	-15.58%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.44%	-24.06%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.99%	-36.68%	-7.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-2.80%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.17%	-32.96%	+19.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	2.82%	+1.28%

Volatility

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) is 3.58%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that XDAX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMIB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDAX.L	IMIB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	4.03%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	12.33%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.10%	15.06%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.94%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	19.35%	+0.09%

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IMIB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDAX.L vs. IMIB.L - Dividend Comparison

XDAX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMIB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	3.75%	3.83%	4.53%	3.77%	3.90%	3.15%	1.44%	3.41%	3.25%	2.29%	2.82%	2.15%
XDAX.L Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDAX.L and IMIB.L in my portfolio?

XDAX.L and IMIB.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDAX.L or IMIB.L?

On fees, XDAX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDAX.L or IMIB.L?

XDAX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IMIB.L.

What is the main difference between XDAX.L and IMIB.L?

XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while IMIB.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDAX.L and 0.35% for IMIB.L.