XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XD9D.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XD9D.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XD9D.DE returned 14.44%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XD9D.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.

Performance

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD9D.DE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.

XD9D.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 25.18%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 14.44%
• 10Y*: —

XMME.DE

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 30.06%
• 6M: 29.85%
• 1Y: 50.91%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XD9D.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF	11.29%	4.60%	32.05%	23.70%	-15.63%	33.05%
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	30.06%	18.69%	13.82%	5.89%	-15.00%	-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XD9D.DE and XMME.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021	0.56

The correlation between XD9D.DE and XMME.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD9D.DE

XD9D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XD9D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XD9D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XD9D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XD9D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

XMME.DE

XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XD9D.DE	XMME.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	3.00	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.96	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.55	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	4.98	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.88	18.04	-6.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD9D.DE and XMME.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XD9D.DE	XMME.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	3.00	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	0.51	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.45	+0.55

Drawdowns

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD9D.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum XMME.DE drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD9D.DE and XMME.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XD9D.DE	XMME.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.73%	-31.96%	+8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.36%	-10.67%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.73%	-19.16%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.73%	-24.38%	+0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-1.04%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.60%	-9.53%	+4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	2.95%	-0.83%

Volatility

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) is 2.77%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XD9D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XD9D.DE	XMME.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	7.48%	-4.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	14.90%	-7.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	17.70%	-5.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	16.74%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.36%	18.61%	-3.25%

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD9D.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XD9D.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison

XD9D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while XMME.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XD9D.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF	0.83%	0.94%	1.17%	1.16%	1.08%	0.27%
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XD9D.DE and XMME.DE in my portfolio?

XD9D.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XD9D.DE or XMME.DE?

On fees, XD9D.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XD9D.DE or XMME.DE?

XD9D.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.

What is the main difference between XD9D.DE and XMME.DE?

XD9D.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XD9D.DE tracks MSCI USA, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XD9D.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.