PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XD9D.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.52%
YTD
11.29%
6M
10.68%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XD9D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF
11.29%4.60%32.05%23.70%-15.63%33.05%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%31.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XD9D.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.84

The correlation between XD9D.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD9D.DE
XD9D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD9D.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD9D.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

Drawdowns

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XD9D.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

Volatility

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XD9D.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD9D.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XD9D.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XD9D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while LCUS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%
XD9D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.83%0.94%1.17%1.16%1.08%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XD9D.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XD9D.DE.

XD9D.DE tracks MSCI USA, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XD9D.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD9D.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer