PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XD9D.DE is traded in EUR, while 5HED.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 5HED.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD9D.DE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than 5HED.DE's -0.34% return.


XD9D.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.52%
YTD
11.29%
6M
10.68%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*

5HED.DE

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.74%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
1.50%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XD9D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF
11.29%4.60%32.05%23.70%-15.63%33.05%
5HED.DE
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
-0.34%-7.59%10.48%12.57%-11.75%25.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XD9D.DE and 5HED.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between XD9D.DE and 5HED.DE has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD9D.DE
XD9D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD9D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

5HED.DE
5HED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD9D.DE5HED.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.06

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

0.51

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

1.28

+10.60

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD9D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the 5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD9D.DE and 5HED.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD9D.DE5HED.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.30

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.21

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.48

+0.51

Drawdowns

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD9D.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum 5HED.DE drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD9D.DE and 5HED.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XD9D.DE5HED.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-32.31%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-6.99%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-21.72%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-21.72%

-2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-11.81%

+11.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-6.47%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.81%

-0.69%

Volatility

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF (XD9D.DE) is 2.77%, while Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that XD9D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5HED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XD9D.DE5HED.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.81%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

8.60%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

11.79%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

15.59%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.50%

-2.14%

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD9D.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HED.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XD9D.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Dividend Comparison

XD9D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while 5HED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
5HED.DE
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD9D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.83%0.94%1.17%1.16%1.08%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


XD9D.DE and 5HED.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XD9D.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD9D.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.

XD9D.DE tracks MSCI USA, while 5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XD9D.DE and 0.75% for 5HED.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD9D.DE and 5HED.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer