PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD5E.DE achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.


XD5E.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.92%
6M
10.72%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.03%

PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.18%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
8.92%24.71%9.50%18.86%-11.92%6.69%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.02

The correlation between XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD5E.DE
XD5E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XD5E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD5E.DEPPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.81

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

4.60

+1.80

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD5E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD5E.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.26

-0.71

Drawdowns

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD5E.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.04%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XD5E.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.04%

-16.60%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-16.60%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.30%

-16.60%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-15.00%

+14.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-4.40%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

6.55%

-3.73%

Volatility

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) is 4.54%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that XD5E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XD5E.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.11%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

20.18%

-8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

23.12%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

16.13%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.13%

+0.90%

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XD5E.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

XD5E.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
2.42%2.54%2.86%2.74%4.66%1.41%2.94%2.59%1.89%2.51%0.73%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

XD5E.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. XD5E.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD5E.DE and PPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer