PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD3E.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than SX5S.L's 6.46% return. Over the past 10 years, XD3E.L has underperformed SX5S.L with an annualized return of 5.77%, while SX5S.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


XD3E.L

1D
0.06%
1M
2.98%
YTD
7.41%
6M
9.39%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
5.77%

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
4.85%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.51%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XD3E.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D
7.41%32.73%0.31%10.10%-8.51%4.29%-9.42%11.99%-15.61%11.95%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-10.62%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XD3E.L and SX5S.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014

0.55

The correlation between XD3E.L and SX5S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XD3E.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

30.2%
25.1%

Energy

14.8%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
5.5%

Industrials

8.1%
22.1%

Utilities

7.9%
4.8%

Basic Materials

7.5%
3.7%

Healthcare

4.3%
5.4%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Technology

1.7%
16.1%

Communication Services

0.0%
2.3%

Financial Services

XD3E.L
30.2%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Energy

XD3E.L
14.8%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XD3E.L
13.7%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

XD3E.L
8.4%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Industrials

XD3E.L
8.1%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Utilities

XD3E.L
7.9%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Basic Materials

XD3E.L
7.5%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Healthcare

XD3E.L
4.3%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Real Estate

XD3E.L
3.5%
SX5S.L

-

Technology

XD3E.L
1.7%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Communication Services

XD3E.L
0.0%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD3E.L
XD3E.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XD3E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD3E.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.62

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

5.40

-0.27

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD3E.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD3E.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD3E.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.23

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.69

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.73

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.59

-0.55

Drawdowns

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD3E.L drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than SX5S.L's maximum drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD3E.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XD3E.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-32.54%

-29.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-11.43%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-13.85%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.44%

-21.71%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.37%

-32.54%

-2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.57%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.83%

-5.44%

-23.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.44%

-0.18%

Volatility

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) is 2.88%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XD3E.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XD3E.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.90%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

12.23%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

15.09%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

17.62%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

19.88%

-0.58%

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD3E.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

XD3E.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

XD3E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while SX5S.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD3E.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D
0.05%0.05%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%0.02%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XD3E.L and SX5S.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XD3E.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XD3E.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XD3E.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer