XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XMEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD, while XMEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCX5.L returned 7.44%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for XMEM.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCX5.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMEM.L.

Performance

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCX5.L achieves a -12.70% return, which is significantly lower than XMEM.L's 25.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX5.L has underperformed XMEM.L with an annualized return of 7.44%, while XMEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.

XCX5.L

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -12.70%
• 6M: -12.76%
• 1Y: -12.07%
• 3Y*: 2.47%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: 7.44%

XMEM.L

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 6.19%
• YTD: 25.99%
• 6M: 27.99%
• 1Y: 53.69%
• 3Y*: 20.58%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C	-12.70%	-5.16%	11.92%	12.56%	2.33%	26.19%	9.49%	2.58%	-3.56%	24.83%
XMEM.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C	25.99%	24.74%	8.98%	2.98%	-10.70%	-2.06%	13.72%	13.41%	-9.64%	25.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XCX5.L and XMEM.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010	0.55

The correlation between XCX5.L and XMEM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (5 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCX5.L	XMEM.L
Financial Services	28.3%	19.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	9.6%
Industrials	10.2%	7.5%
Energy	9.5%	4.1%
Basic Materials	8.5%	6.6%
Technology	8.2%	36.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	3.0%
Healthcare	6.1%	2.9%
Communication Services	4.7%	6.9%
Utilities	4.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.3%	1.0%

Return for Risk

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCX5.L

XCX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XCX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XCX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
XCX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
XCX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2

XMEM.L

XMEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
XMEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XMEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XMEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XMEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCX5.L	XMEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	3.14	-3.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	4.04	-5.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.58	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	4.87	-5.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	17.24	-18.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the XMEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCX5.L and XMEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCX5.L	XMEM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76	3.14	-3.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.54	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.63	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.30	-0.07

Drawdowns

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum XMEM.L drawdown of -54.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX5.L and XMEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCX5.L	XMEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.74%	-54.53%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.88%	-10.96%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.47%	-15.33%	-11.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.47%	-23.94%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.35%	-27.58%	-9.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.06%	-2.44%	-20.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.04%	-11.73%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.81%	3.10%	+5.71%

Volatility

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) is 6.39%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that XCX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCX5.L	XMEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	7.37%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.26%	14.54%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	17.04%	-1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	16.89%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.89%	18.31%	+1.58%

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCX5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XMEM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCX5.L vs. XMEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCX5.L nor XMEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCX5.L and XMEM.L in my portfolio?

XCX5.L and XMEM.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCX5.L or XMEM.L?

On fees, XMEM.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCX5.L or XMEM.L?

XMEM.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.

What is the main difference between XCX5.L and XMEM.L?

XCX5.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XMEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while XMEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XCX5.L and 0.49% for XMEM.L.