XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L
XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XDDX.L (Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD, while XDDX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FSE DAX TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCX5.L returned 7.44%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for XDDX.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCX5.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDDX.L.
Performance
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCX5.L achieves a -12.70% return, which is significantly lower than XDDX.L's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX5.L has underperformed XDDX.L with an annualized return of 7.44%, while XDDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.67% annualized return.
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- -12.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
XDDX.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.70% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
XDDX.L Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 3.63% | 24.81% | 11.28% | 17.04% | -8.48% | 7.86% | 9.39% | 16.41% | -17.15% | 16.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX5.L and XDDX.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2013 | 0.48 |
The correlation between XCX5.L and XDDX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Consumer Cyclical
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Industrials
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Energy
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
-
Basic Materials
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Technology
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Consumer Defensive
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Healthcare
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Communication Services
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Utilities
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
-
Real Estate
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCX5.L
XDDX.L
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) and Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCX5.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.11 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.67 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 2.01 | -3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCX5.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 | 0.57 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.52 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.54 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.46 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, which is greater than XDDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX5.L and XDDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCX5.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -35.15% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.88% | -13.08% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -14.36% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -23.84% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | -35.15% | -2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -1.41% | -21.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -6.63% | -4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.81% | 4.35% | +4.46% |
Volatility
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) at 4.38%. This indicates that XCX5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCX5.L | XDDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 4.38% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.26% | 12.07% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 15.21% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 16.94% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 17.99% | +1.90% |
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XDDX.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCX5.L vs. XDDX.L - Dividend Comparison
XCX5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDDX.L Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 2.30% | 2.39% | 2.75% | 3.30% | 5.08% | 2.13% | 3.09% | 2.87% | 2.26% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCX5.L and XDDX.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDDX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDDX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XCX5.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XDDX.L is Europe Equities. XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while XDDX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XCX5.L and 0.09% for XDDX.L.
Find the right allocation for XCX5.L and XDDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer