PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCX4.L (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) and IAPD.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XCX4.L tracks the MSCI Thailand NR THB while IAPD.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L returned 5.61%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for IAPD.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCX4.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IAPD.L.

Performance

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCX4.L achieves a 29.73% return, which is significantly higher than IAPD.L's 13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L has underperformed IAPD.L with an annualized return of 5.61%, while IAPD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.

XCX4.L

1D
0.91%
1M
7.89%
YTD
29.73%
6M
30.03%
1Y
55.99%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
5.61%

IAPD.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.77%
YTD
13.20%
6M
13.76%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCX4.L
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C		29.73%-0.00%1.83%-16.15%16.42%-0.57%-13.81%3.68%0.70%21.77%
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS		13.20%22.91%9.51%8.99%11.40%6.82%-11.63%11.98%-8.55%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XCX4.L and IAPD.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2010

0.36

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XCX4.L
IAPD.L

Industrials

35.6%
7.1%

Energy

14.5%
5.1%

Communication Services

12.7%
4.7%

Financial Services

10.1%
30.9%

Healthcare

8.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
5.2%

Utilities

6.6%
4.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
16.1%

Real Estate

3.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
10.9%

Technology

-

1.6%

Industrials

XCX4.L
35.6%
IAPD.L
7.1%

Energy

XCX4.L
14.5%
IAPD.L
5.1%

Communication Services

XCX4.L
12.7%
IAPD.L
4.7%

Financial Services

XCX4.L
10.1%
IAPD.L
30.9%

Healthcare

XCX4.L
8.0%
IAPD.L
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

XCX4.L
7.9%
IAPD.L
5.2%

Utilities

XCX4.L
6.6%
IAPD.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

XCX4.L
4.2%
IAPD.L
16.1%

Real Estate

XCX4.L
3.2%
IAPD.L
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XCX4.L
1.7%
IAPD.L
10.9%

Technology

XCX4.L

-

IAPD.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C

iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS

Often compared with XCX4.L:
XCX4.L vs. XDEQ.LXCX4.L vs. EXUS.LXCX4.L vs. HMXJ.LXCX4.L vs. XNAS.LXCX4.L vs. XXTW.LXCX4.L vs. ESPS.LXCX4.L vs. KRWL.L
Often compared with IAPD.L:
IAPD.L vs. 100D.LIAPD.L vs. JEPQIAPD.L vs. NOBLIAPD.L vs. CNDX.LIAPD.L vs. IJRIAPD.L vs. VAPX.LIAPD.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XCX4.L
XCX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
IAPD.L
IAPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XCX4.LIAPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.65
3.89

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.55
5.56

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.71

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

6.04

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

20.30

-5.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCX4.L and IAPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XCX4.LIAPD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

3.89

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

1.02

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.62

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.56

-0.25

Drawdowns

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCX4.L drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum IAPD.L drawdown of -52.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX4.L and IAPD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XCX4.LIAPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.14%

-52.66%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-6.92%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.34%

-16.88%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

-16.88%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.14%

-37.53%

-6.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-2.91%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-7.37%

-10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.06%

+1.70%

Volatility

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that XCX4.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XCX4.LIAPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

3.49%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.46%

8.32%

+8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

10.73%

+10.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

12.44%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

15.46%

+6.42%

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCX4.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCX4.L vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison

XCX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS		4.89%5.67%6.72%7.29%8.34%7.53%4.77%7.26%7.70%6.15%5.60%8.10%
XCX4.L
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XCX4.L and IAPD.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCX4.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCX4.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IAPD.L.

XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB, while IAPD.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCX4.L and 0.59% for IAPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCX4.L and IAPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer