PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCX4.L vs. C300.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCX4.L is traded in GBp, while C300.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the C300.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCX4.L achieves a 25.38% return, which is significantly higher than C300.L's 12.87% return.


XCX4.L

1D
-1.72%
1M
-3.84%
6M
25.87%
YTD
25.38%
1Y
44.82%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
3.94%

C300.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.63%
6M
9.76%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
38.18%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCX4.L
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C
25.38%0.32%1.51%-16.15%10.19%
C300.L
Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
12.87%24.25%16.79%-16.21%3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XCX4.L and C300.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022

0.30

The correlation between XCX4.L and C300.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCX4.L vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCX4.L
XCX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

C300.L
C300.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
C300.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C300.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
C300.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
C300.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
C300.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCX4.LC300.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

4.64

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

14.17

-2.29

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the C300.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCX4.L and C300.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCX4.L drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than C300.L's maximum drawdown of -34.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX4.L and C300.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCX4.LC300.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.74%

-34.94%

-63.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-8.28%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.34%

-26.04%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-5.87%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-15.09%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.70%

+1.06%

Volatility

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) is 7.60%, while Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that XCX4.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCX4.LC300.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

9.20%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

15.16%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

19.70%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

21.48%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,419.84%

21.48%

+2,398.36%

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCX4.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than C300.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCX4.L vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCX4.L nor C300.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XCX4.L and C300.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, C300.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C300.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCX4.L.

XCX4.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while C300.L is China Equities. XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB, while C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCX4.L and 0.35% for C300.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCX4.L and C300.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer