XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE
XCTE.DE (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and ESIT.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from DWS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTE.DE returned 8.42%/yr vs 19.68%/yr for ESIT.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCTE.DE charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIT.DE.
Performance
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCTE.DE achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than ESIT.DE's 35.07% return.
XCTE.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 17.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIT.DE
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -8.73%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 35.07%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- —
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCTE.DE Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.24% | 19.05% | 22.69% | -18.15% | -8.46% |
ESIT.DE iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 35.07% | 10.04% | 7.42% | 34.97% | -10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCTE.DE and ESIT.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022 | 0.33 |
The correlation between XCTE.DE and ESIT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCTE.DE
ESIT.DE
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCTE.DE | ESIT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 4.10 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 9.89 | -8.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCTE.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, which is greater than ESIT.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.DE and ESIT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCTE.DE | ESIT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.80% | -38.29% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.30% | -11.49% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.31% | -27.07% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.37% | -11.49% | -5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -11.86% | -13.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.57% | 4.68% | +9.89% |
Volatility
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) is 7.74%, while iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIT.DE) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that XCTE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCTE.DE | ESIT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 10.32% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 23.00% | -6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.91% | 27.96% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.25% | 26.22% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.25% | 25.55% | +4.70% |
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCTE.DE has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIT.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCTE.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCTE.DE nor ESIT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCTE.DE and ESIT.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIT.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIT.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for XCTE.DE.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XCTE.DE and 0.18% for ESIT.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCTE.DE and ESIT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer