PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCSR.TO achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than CLSA.TO's 22.07% return.


XCSR.TO

1D
1.26%
1M
6.36%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.56%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*

CLSA.TO

1D
1.12%
1M
7.65%
YTD
22.07%
6M
30.64%
1Y
72.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XCSR.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

0.62

The correlation between XCSR.TO and CLSA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCSR.TO
XCSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSA.TO
CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCSR.TOCLSA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.99

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

6.77

-3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

28.97

-17.33

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCSR.TO and CLSA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCSR.TOCLSA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

5.03

-2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

4.33

-4.25

Drawdowns

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCSR.TO and CLSA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCSR.TOCLSA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-11.73%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-10.78%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-1.36%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.51%

+0.28%

Volatility

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) at 3.20%. This indicates that XCSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCSR.TOCLSA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.20%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

12.39%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

14.50%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

16.54%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,367.87%

16.54%

+1,351.33%

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCSR.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSA.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCSR.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than CLSA.TO's 10.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CLSA.TO
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF
10.64%7.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
1.63%1.73%2.20%2.61%2.78%1.53%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCSR.TO and CLSA.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCSR.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CLSA.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCSR.TO and 0.60% for CLSA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCSR.TO and CLSA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer