XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCS7.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while ETLQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCS7.DE returned 7.69%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for ETLQ.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS7.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than ETLQ.DE's 10.88% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.88% | 8.14% | 26.10% | 20.83% | -6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
ETLQ.DE
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS7.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.39 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.56 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 14.23 | -13.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS7.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 2.13 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.93 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, which is greater than ETLQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and ETLQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -33.38% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -6.68% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -21.58% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.97% | -0.34% | -14.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -4.33% | -11.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 1.68% | +6.50% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that XCS7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 2.68% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 7.77% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 11.18% | +7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 14.06% | +11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 15.74% | +9.91% |
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while ETLQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS7.DE and ETLQ.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
XCS7.DE is categorized as China Equities, while ETLQ.DE is Global Equities. XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and ETLQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer