XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE
XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XCS6.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCS6.DE returned -4.64%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCS6.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS6.DE achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.24% | 16.38% | 27.05% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.27% | 15.11% | 26.93% | -16.14% | 14.17% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS6.DE and XMME.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XCS6.DE and XMME.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS6.DE
XMME.DE
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS6.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.55 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 4.98 | -4.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 18.04 | -17.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS6.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 3.00 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.51 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.45 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS6.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS6.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.31% | -31.96% | -24.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -10.67% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.77% | -19.16% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.94% | -24.38% | -25.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.60% | -1.04% | -32.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.19% | -9.53% | -11.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 2.95% | +5.32% |
Volatility
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) have volatilities of 7.17% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS6.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 7.48% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 14.90% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 17.70% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 16.74% | +10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 18.61% | +6.72% |
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS6.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS6.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCS6.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS6.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
XCS6.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XCS6.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS6.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer