PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS6.DE vs. UNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCS6.DE is traded in EUR, while UNH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UNH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS6.DE achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 24.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS6.DE has underperformed UNH with an annualized return of 4.37%, while UNH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


XCS6.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-7.24%
6M
-9.67%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
-4.64%
10Y*
4.37%

UNH

1D
1.56%
1M
10.91%
YTD
24.34%
6M
23.76%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
-6.91%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCS6.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
-7.24%16.38%27.05%-15.14%-15.45%-17.27%15.11%26.93%-16.14%35.18%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
24.34%-41.07%4.03%-2.23%13.56%56.06%11.26%22.71%19.90%22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS6.DE and UNH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2011

0.16

The correlation between XCS6.DE and UNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS6.DE vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS6.DE
XCS6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCS6.DEUNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.22

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

1.35

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

2.88

-2.61

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the UNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS6.DE and UNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCS6.DEUNHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.94

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.08

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.42

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.43

-0.27

Drawdowns

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, smaller than the maximum UNH drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS6.DE and UNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS6.DEUNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.31%

-68.21%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-28.22%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-64.49%

+39.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.94%

-64.49%

+14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.31%

-64.49%

+8.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.60%

-38.75%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-16.20%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

13.20%

-4.93%

Volatility

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) is 7.17%, while UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that XCS6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS6.DEUNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

8.29%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

31.81%

-18.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

40.67%

-22.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

32.23%

-4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.33%

30.76%

-5.43%

Dividends

XCS6.DE vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison

XCS6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.21%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%
XCS6.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCS6.DE and UNH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS6.DE and UNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer