XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE
XCS2.DE (Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XEON.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XCS2.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while XEON.DE is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCS2.DE returned -0.09%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for XEON.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS2.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for XEON.DE.
Performance
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS2.DE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than XEON.DE's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS2.DE has underperformed XEON.DE with an annualized return of -0.09%, while XEON.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.72% annualized return.
XCS2.DE
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.91%
- 10Y*
- -0.09%
XEON.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 1.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 0.72%
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS2.DE Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.74% | -2.17% | -1.70% | 0.78% | -13.88% | -0.26% | 4.13% | 9.65% | -0.82% | -2.48% |
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.98% | 2.25% | 3.78% | 3.30% | -0.04% | -0.58% | -0.57% | -0.49% | -0.47% | -0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS2.DE and XEON.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS2.DE
XEON.DE
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCS2.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 4.45 | -3.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 69.56 | -67.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 323.59 | -316.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than XEON.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS2.DE and XEON.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS2.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -3.71% | -37.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -0.03% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.00% | -0.08% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.36% | -0.66% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.58% | -3.21% | -38.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.78% | 0.00% | -32.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.75% | -0.88% | -24.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.01% | +1.36% |
Volatility
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) at 0.05%. This indicates that XCS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEON.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS2.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 0.05% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 0.15% | +7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 0.22% | +8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 0.25% | +9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 0.39% | +20.63% |
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS2.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEON.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCS2.DE vs. XEON.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCS2.DE nor XEON.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS2.DE and XEON.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.
XCS2.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while XEON.DE is Bank Loan. XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCS2.DE and 0.10% for XEON.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS2.DE and XEON.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer