XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE
XCS2.DE (Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and E15G.DE (Amundi Euro Government Bond 15+Y UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - XCS2.DE tracks the FTSE Australian Government Bond Index while E15G.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 15+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCS2.DE returned -1.97%/yr vs -8.79%/yr for E15G.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS2.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for E15G.DE.
Performance
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS2.DE achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than E15G.DE's -1.02% return.
XCS2.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- -0.24%
E15G.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- -1.91%
- 3Y*
- -1.11%
- 5Y*
- -8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS2.DE Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.53% | -2.17% | -1.70% | 0.78% | -13.88% | -0.26% | 2.12% |
E15G.DE Amundi Euro Government Bond 15+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.02% | -6.02% | -1.35% | 9.51% | -35.59% | -7.77% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS2.DE and E15G.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between XCS2.DE and E15G.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS2.DE
E15G.DE
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 15+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCS2.DE | E15G.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | -0.31 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | -0.63 | +7.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum E15G.DE drawdown of -46.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS2.DE and E15G.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS2.DE | E15G.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -46.08% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -6.17% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.00% | -12.77% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.36% | -44.05% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.91% | -40.88% | +7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.77% | -29.75% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 3.05% | -1.65% |
Volatility
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Amundi Euro Government Bond 15+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15G.DE) at 2.59%. This indicates that XCS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than E15G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS2.DE | E15G.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 2.59% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 7.35% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.96% | 9.36% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 14.26% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 13.56% | +7.46% |
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS2.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than E15G.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCS2.DE vs. E15G.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while E15G.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E15G.DE Amundi Euro Government Bond 15+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.02% | 2.99% | 2.47% | 2.13% | 2.81% | 1.91% | 0.73% |
XCS2.DE Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS2.DE and E15G.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, E15G.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
E15G.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.
XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while E15G.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 15+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCS2.DE and 0.15% for E15G.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS2.DE and E15G.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer