PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO) and Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS.TO achieves a 23.53% return, which is significantly higher than DMEC.TO's 10.72% return.


XCS.TO

1D
-1.30%
1M
4.71%
YTD
23.53%
6M
21.57%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
9.94%

DMEC.TO

1D
-1.07%
1M
3.70%
YTD
10.72%
6M
13.13%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XCS.TO
iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF
23.53%43.37%10.31%
DMEC.TO
Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF
10.72%31.87%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS.TO and DMEC.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2024

0.68

The correlation between XCS.TO and DMEC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS.TO
XCS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XCS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DMEC.TO
DMEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DMEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO) and Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCS.TODMEC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.73

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

17.20

-2.53

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the DMEC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS.TO and DMEC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCS.TODMEC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.80

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

2.21

-1.97

Drawdowns

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.18%, which is greater than DMEC.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS.TO and DMEC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS.TODMEC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.18%

-12.15%

-49.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.58%

-9.41%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.07%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-1.42%

-15.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

2.04%

+2.21%

Volatility

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF (DMEC.TO) at 3.42%. This indicates that XCS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS.TODMEC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.42%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

10.28%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

12.56%

+9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

12.97%

+7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

12.97%

+7.44%

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DMEC.TO's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCS.TO vs. DMEC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than DMEC.TO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMEC.TO
Desjardins Canadian Equity Index ETF
1.91%1.78%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCS.TO
iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF
1.03%1.36%1.73%2.59%2.07%1.51%1.78%2.27%2.12%1.81%1.46%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCS.TO and DMEC.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DMEC.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DMEC.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XCS.TO.

XCS.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD, while DMEC.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Desjardins. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XCS.TO and 0.05% for DMEC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS.TO and DMEC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer