PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCOU.L is traded in USD, while CRPS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CRPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOU.L achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than CRPS.L's -2.08% return.


XCOU.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.00%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
10Y*

CRPS.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-2.08%
6M
-1.39%
1Y
0.51%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCOU.L
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
0.81%5.28%4.41%8.47%-4.52%
CRPS.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-2.08%7.96%0.98%8.30%-4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XCOU.L and CRPS.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.61

The correlation between XCOU.L and CRPS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCOU.L
XCOU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XCOU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CRPS.L
CRPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCOU.LCRPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.02

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.09

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

0.22

+4.44

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the CRPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOU.L and CRPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCOU.LCRPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.09

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.25

+0.60

Drawdowns

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOU.L drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum CRPS.L drawdown of -25.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOU.L and CRPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCOU.LCRPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-25.57%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-5.96%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.46%

-6.31%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-6.30%

+5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-5.75%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

2.30%

-1.54%

Volatility

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) is 1.20%, while iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that XCOU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCOU.LCRPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.85%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

4.39%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

6.03%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.10%

7.58%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

7.41%

-3.31%

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CRPS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCOU.L vs. CRPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCOU.L nor CRPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRPS.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%2.08%3.87%3.34%2.55%2.07%2.42%2.75%2.56%2.61%2.45%2.58%
XCOU.L
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCOU.L and CRPS.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCOU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCOU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CRPS.L.

XCOU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD, while CRPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCOU.L and 0.20% for CRPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCOU.L and CRPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer