XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE
XCO2.DE (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and CSY8.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XCO2.DE is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while CSY8.DE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCO2.DE returned -0.67%/yr vs 6.40%/yr for CSY8.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCO2.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSY8.DE.
Performance
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCO2.DE achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than CSY8.DE's 12.89% return.
XCO2.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CSY8.DE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCO2.DE Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.67% | 1.13% | 4.41% | 5.82% | -15.31% | -2.31% | 0.90% |
CSY8.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 12.89% | -2.70% | 13.60% | 12.50% | -11.53% | 31.40% | 24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCO2.DE and CSY8.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, XCO2.DE and CSY8.DE have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCO2.DE
CSY8.DE
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCO2.DE | CSY8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 3.68 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | 11.46 | -9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCO2.DE | CSY8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.52 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.31 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.62 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum CSY8.DE drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.DE and CSY8.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCO2.DE | CSY8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -31.41% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.36% | -6.99% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.45% | -31.41% | +28.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -31.41% | +14.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | 0.00% | -7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -7.79% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 2.25% | -1.50% |
Volatility
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) is 0.81%, while CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that XCO2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSY8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCO2.DE | CSY8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 3.95% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 10.69% | -8.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55% | 16.98% | -14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 20.19% | -15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 20.28% | -15.03% |
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCO2.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY8.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCO2.DE vs. CSY8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCO2.DE nor CSY8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCO2.DE and CSY8.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCO2.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCO2.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSY8.DE.
XCO2.DE is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while CSY8.DE is Small Cap Blend Equities. XCO2.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while CSY8.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCO2.DE and 0.20% for CSY8.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCO2.DE and CSY8.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer