XCNY vs. GLDM
XCNY (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XCNY is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XCNY returned 29.37% vs 19.09% for GLDM. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCNY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
XCNY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCNY achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -7.26% return.
XCNY
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -12.90%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XCNY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 17.77% | 20.42% | -3.63% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -7.26% | 64.20% | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCNY and GLDM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCNY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
XCNY
GLDM
XCNY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCNY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.15 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 0.73 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 1.80 | +7.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCNY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCNY drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNY and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCNY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -26.11% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | -26.11% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -25.85% | +21.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -6.43% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 10.63% | -7.38% |
Volatility
XCNY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 7.75% and 7.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCNY | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 7.60% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 24.04% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 27.76% | -9.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.30% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 17.07% | +1.40% |
XCNY vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCNY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCNY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
XCNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 2.27% | 2.68% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCNY and GLDM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCNY has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to GLDM (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCNY dropped -19.70% vs GLDM's -26.11%.
On 1-year performance, XCNY leads with 29.37% vs 19.09% for GLDM. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XCNY has performed better with a 29.37% return vs 19.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCNY.
XCNY has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
XCNY is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GLDM is Gold. XCNY tracks S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCNY and 0.10% for GLDM.
XCNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCNY and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer