XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO
XCNS.TO (iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio) and XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCNS.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares, while XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. XCNS.TO is actively managed, while XIU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCNS.TO returned 5.71%/yr vs 14.37%/yr for XIU.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCNS.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XIU.TO.
Performance
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCNS.TO achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 10.14% return.
XCNS.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XIU.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 5.57% | 9.44% | 11.73% | 10.66% | -11.25% | 5.93% | 10.28% | 3.45% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 10.14% | 28.89% | 20.73% | 11.85% | -6.35% | 28.06% | 5.27% | 7.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCNS.TO and XIU.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XCNS.TO and XIU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Financial Services
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Industrials
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Communication Services
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Energy
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Basic Materials
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Healthcare
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Utilities
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Real Estate
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XCNS.TO
XIU.TO
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCNS.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.49 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 4.16 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 19.30 | -9.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCNS.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.71 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.13 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.51 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNS.TO and XIU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCNS.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -52.31% | +35.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -7.65% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.40% | -12.36% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.09% | -16.36% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.87% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -11.63% | +8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 1.64% | -0.40% |
Volatility
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCNS.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.28% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.72% | 9.32% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.67% | 11.73% | -5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 12.78% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 15.01% | -7.40% |
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCNS.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCNS.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than XIU.TO's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.50% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 2.15% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.43% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.18% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCNS.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XCNS.TO.
XCNS.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XCNS.TO and 0.18% for XIU.TO.
Find the right allocation for XCNS.TO and XIU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer