PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCNS.TO (iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio) and VRE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCNS.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares, while VRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE CA All Cap RE Capped 25% Idx. XCNS.TO is actively managed, while VRE.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCNS.TO returned 5.78%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for VRE.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCNS.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VRE.TO.

Performance

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF (VRE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCNS.TO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than VRE.TO's 1.12% return.

XCNS.TO

1D
0.34%
1M
3.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
4.54%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
—

VRE.TO

1D
0.53%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio		5.93%9.44%11.73%10.66%-11.25%5.93%10.28%3.45%
VRE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF		1.12%3.98%7.36%9.25%-22.67%35.57%-12.27%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XCNS.TO and VRE.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2019

0.54

The correlation between XCNS.TO and VRE.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XCNS.TO
VRE.TO

Technology

12.2%
0.0%

Financial Services

9.4%
0.2%

Industrials

3.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

3.1%
0.0%

Energy

3.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

2.7%
0.1%

Healthcare

2.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
0.0%

Utilities

0.7%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
100.0%

Technology

XCNS.TO
12.2%
VRE.TO
0.0%

Financial Services

XCNS.TO
9.4%
VRE.TO
0.2%

Industrials

XCNS.TO
3.6%
VRE.TO
0.0%

Communication Services

XCNS.TO
3.1%
VRE.TO
0.0%

Energy

XCNS.TO
3.1%
VRE.TO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XCNS.TO
3.1%
VRE.TO
0.0%

Basic Materials

XCNS.TO
2.7%
VRE.TO
0.1%

Healthcare

XCNS.TO
2.4%
VRE.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XCNS.TO
1.7%
VRE.TO
0.0%

Utilities

XCNS.TO
0.7%
VRE.TO
0.0%

Real Estate

XCNS.TO
0.2%
VRE.TO
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio

Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF

Often compared with XCNS.TO:
XCNS.TO vs. XBAL.TOXCNS.TO vs. XINC.TOXCNS.TO vs. VCNS.TOXCNS.TO vs. XEQT.TOXCNS.TO vs. GCNS.TOXCNS.TO vs. XGRO.TOXCNS.TO vs. XTR.TO
Often compared with VRE.TO:
VRE.TO vs. XRE.TOVRE.TO vs. ZRE.TOVRE.TO vs. VDY.TOVRE.TO vs. VCN.TOVRE.TO vs. VFV.TOVRE.TO vs. XEI.TOVRE.TO vs. VCE.TO

Return for Risk

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XCNS.TO
XCNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
VRE.TO
VRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF (VRE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XCNS.TOVRE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.95
0.32

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.80
0.53

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.06

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

0.27

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

0.58

+9.86

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the VRE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCNS.TO and VRE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XCNS.TOVRE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

0.32

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.10

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.26

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.33

+0.53

Drawdowns

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum VRE.TO drawdown of -48.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNS.TO and VRE.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XCNS.TOVRE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-48.06%

+31.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-15.00%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

-18.42%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

-29.87%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-48.06%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-8.19%

+7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-8.28%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

7.04%

-5.80%

Volatility

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) is 3.14%, while Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF (VRE.TO) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that XCNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XCNS.TOVRE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

3.46%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

9.99%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.67%

13.02%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

15.96%

-9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.61%

17.51%

-9.90%

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCNS.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VRE.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCNS.TO vs. VRE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than VRE.TO's 2.81% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF		2.81%2.85%2.96%2.64%4.73%2.73%3.72%5.15%3.82%3.72%4.10%2.01%
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio		2.49%2.55%2.58%2.49%2.26%1.81%2.15%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XCNS.TO and VRE.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCNS.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VRE.TO.

XCNS.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VRE.TO is REIT. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XCNS.TO and 0.30% for VRE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCNS.TO and VRE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer