PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCNS.TO vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCNS.TO is traded in CAD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCNS.TO achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -12.92% return.


XCNS.TO

1D
-1.31%
1M
0.69%
YTD
4.68%
6M
5.13%
1Y
12.81%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-0.91%
1M
1.46%
YTD
-12.92%
6M
-15.10%
1Y
-9.97%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
4.68%10.46%11.73%10.67%-11.25%5.93%10.28%3.19%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-12.92%10.31%22.49%54.43%-23.46%52.40%39.15%15.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XCNS.TO and MSFT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2019

0.41

The correlation between XCNS.TO and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCNS.TO
XCNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCNS.TOMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.95

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

-0.29

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

-0.59

+11.23

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCNS.TO and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCNS.TOMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

-0.40

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.52

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.56

+0.27

Drawdowns

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -44.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNS.TO and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCNS.TOMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-44.28%

+26.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-34.57%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

-34.57%

+28.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

-34.57%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-23.82%

+22.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-10.48%

+6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

17.04%

-15.83%

Volatility

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) is 3.29%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that XCNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCNS.TOMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

10.01%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

22.17%

-16.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.73%

25.19%

-18.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.90%

27.32%

-20.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.78%

28.00%

-20.22%

Dividends

XCNS.TO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

XCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than MSFT's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.86%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.51%2.54%2.58%2.49%2.26%1.81%2.15%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCNS.TO and MSFT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCNS.TO and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer