XCLN.TO vs. PBW
XCLN.TO (iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF) and PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCLN.TO is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while PBW is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCLN.TO returned 8.97%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for PBW. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCLN.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PBW.
Performance
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCLN.TO is traded in CAD, while PBW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PBW values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCLN.TO achieves a 43.07% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 50.54% return.
XCLN.TO
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- YTD
- 43.07%
- 6M
- 37.48%
- 1Y
- 84.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBW
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- 20.52%
- YTD
- 50.54%
- 6M
- 46.34%
- 1Y
- 154.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- -7.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF | 43.07% | 37.41% | -19.86% | -21.98% | 13.22% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 50.54% | 46.90% | -24.82% | -21.80% | -20.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCLN.TO and PBW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, XCLN.TO and PBW have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCLN.TO vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
XCLN.TO
PBW
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCLN.TO | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.49 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.00 | 7.43 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.91 | 19.11 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCLN.TO | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | 3.93 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.08 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCLN.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -87.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLN.TO and PBW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCLN.TO | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.29% | -87.66% | +38.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -20.92% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.31% | -65.39% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -58.99% | +58.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -45.15% | +19.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 8.12% | -3.87% |
Volatility
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) is 10.50%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that XCLN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCLN.TO | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.50% | 13.43% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 27.69% | -7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.95% | 39.70% | -12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.50% | 40.90% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.50% | 36.79% | -11.29% |
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCLN.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCLN.TO vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
XCLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than PBW's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 0.60% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCLN.TO and PBW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCLN.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.
XCLN.TO is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while PBW is Small Cap Growth Equities. XCLN.TO tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XCLN.TO and 0.61% for PBW.
Find the right allocation for XCLN.TO and PBW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer