PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 19.48% return, which is significantly higher than NS4E.DE's 17.06% return.


XCJD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
6M
13.22%
YTD
19.48%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
10Y*

NS4E.DE

1D
-2.16%
1M
-2.98%
6M
9.96%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
42.35%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
19.48%10.38%7.06%-0.50%
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
17.06%27.33%22.81%26.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XCJD.DE and NS4E.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023

0.78

The correlation between XCJD.DE and NS4E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCJD.DE
XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NS4E.DE
NS4E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCJD.DENS4E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

4.40

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

15.01

-10.61

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCJD.DE and NS4E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum NS4E.DE drawdown of -35.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and NS4E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCJD.DENS4E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-35.32%

+18.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.78%

-9.59%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-20.96%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-4.65%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-8.00%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

2.81%

+4.92%

Volatility

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) have volatilities of 6.04% and 6.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCJD.DENS4E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.07%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

15.68%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.56%

19.57%

+8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

18.21%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

18.20%

+2.28%

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NS4E.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCJD.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while NS4E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
1.35%1.55%2.21%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCJD.DE and NS4E.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCJD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCJD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCJD.DE and NS4E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer